Lignumis


Dive into the world of Lignumis, a moon of Nauvis offering only the most basic technologies.

Content
3 days ago
2.0
18.6K
Factorio: Space Age Icon Space Age Mod
Planets Logistics Environment Mining Fluids Manufacturing

b Long Handed Crash

11 days ago

Failed to load mods: ...mis__/prototypes/content/burner-long-handed-inserter.lua:16: attempt to index field 'sheet' (a nil value)
stack traceback:
...mis__/prototypes/content/burner-long-handed-inserter.lua:16: in main chunk
[C]: in function 'require'
lignumis/prototypes/content/data.lua:12: in main chunk
[C]: in function 'require'
lignumis/data.lua:43: in main chunk

11 days ago

Also using bobs logistics & adjustable inserters which prefer over long hands.

10 days ago

These mods load fine with Lignumis. It must be something else. Some mod is changing the long handed inserter graphics that causes this.

9 days ago

I can't reproduce it. It loads fine. Can you try to find a minimal setup that gets you the error?

9 days ago
(updated 9 days ago)

both Yea & No i just not interested to trim down 202 mods Tho thanks for the help. Can provide a save game on git tho. Also I don't want you ether to have to bother with this needle in the haystack

9 days ago

"i just not interested to trim down 202 mods"
Dito 😉

9 days ago

yea

3 days ago

The same error occurs
but if I disable these two mods, the error disappears:
1. https://mods.factorio.com/mod/boblogistics
2. https://mods.factorio.com/mod/bobassembly

3 days ago
3 days ago

Hm. It's not easy to decide how to handle this. I really don't want to be incompatible with the reskins mod but I also don't want to duplicate vanilla code and miss any future updates from Wube for that code. In my opinion such mods should apply their changes for vanilla entities in the updates phase. But that probably won't happen in this case. It's neither a small change for the reskins mod to change it nor for me to copy the vanilla code. My time is currently very limited so for the time being I'd say the mods are just not compatible. I'm sorry I don't have a better answer.

2 days ago

Thank you for the explanation

New response